Metallurgy

Met Daily: the daily metallurgical review, signed

Turn routine plant files into a traceable review of each reporting period: what arrived, what is still provisional, the agreed results on a stated mass basis, where performance deviated, whether metal out accounts for metal in, and what the responsible metallurgist signed.

Request a Free Session

Demo with made-up data · In development

Who it is for

Built around one practical workflow first

Plant metallurgists, process engineers and senior metallurgists who review each day before the monthly metal account.
Production superintendents and technical-services managers who need to know which numbers are still provisional and who signed the period.

Workflow pain

Where the work usually slows down

The daily report is a spreadsheet with a formula nobody remembers choosing, and yesterday’s provisional grades are silently overwritten when the assays land.
Moisture is applied inconsistently, so wet and dry tonnes get multiplied by grades on the wrong basis.
A recovery that balances by construction is read as evidence that the balance is right.

Implementation design

What Eleticle builds and controls

What is built

Import of historian, laboratory, target, calibration, delay, reagent and dispatch-lot files, with saved mapping templates and multi-day packs split by period.
Versioned calculations: moisture and dry basis, period aggregation, a recovery formula chosen from a catalogue and locked to the site, accountability with declared inventory, component consistency, and tolerances derived from your stream accuracies.
A period lifecycle with value status, audited provisional-to-actual replacement, findings, signatory close and reopen, and PDF and XLSX report packs that name every provisional value.

What data is used

Your plant’s daily and shift exports as CSV or XLSX, uploaded on the review cadence your team chooses.
Your site configuration: shifts, streams, balance nodes, units, targets, stream accuracies, time model and signatories.

What AI may do

Describe what changed in a period and prepare questions for the metallurgist.
Draft one clearly labelled review note that names every provisional value.
Answer questions from accepted results and their evidence.

What it does not do

Not the metal accounting system of record, and no AMIRA P754 compliance claim.
Single-concentrate circuits only in this version; no multi-product reconciliation.
No live historian, LIMS or DCS connection, no setpoint recommendation, and no root-cause claims.

Human review

The app calculates and flags. A signatory signs.

The assistant is scoped around clear boundaries: what it can read, what it can prepare, what must be reviewed, and what should stay manual.

Only a current signatory reviews, closes, finally closes or reopens a period, and the role is recorded at the time of the action.

Replacing a provisional value is an audited action with a mandatory reason and a new revision; the superseded revision stays readable.

Before and after

Example workflow change

Before

The day is closed in a spreadsheet at the end of the shift, before the assays arrive, and corrected quietly the next morning.

After

The period calculates as provisional, becomes actual when the laboratory file lands, shows its accountability and findings, and is closed by a signatory to an immutable report.

More workflows

Industrial operations

Private AI for industrial operations and technical workflows

QA/QC

Assay Guard: laboratory QA/QC review

Testwork

Testwork Atlas: testwork records with provenance

Comminution

Grinding & Classification Monitor: what the circuit did

Start with one free session

Share the workflow you want to improve. Eleticle will help identify the safest useful first step.

Request a Free Session